[openrisc] Re: Hi BOTH,

["Damjan Lampret" <lampret@opencores.org>]

> Hi Damjan,
> if possible, could the core be OR1600?(since I think the ISA is OR16)

Of course it can be. But should I rename my 1001 and 1003 to something else?
What numbers in OR1000 mean?

I think something like this:

1000 is general architecture. So an actual implementation must have the
first number 1xxx if it is compliant to OR1000 architecture. Perhaps second
number should identify to which subclass it belogs or which ISA implements?
Any third and fourth numbers should be version numbers. Something like that
...

Suggestions? Ideas?

> (I'm back to Taiwan. one day earlier than my original schedule.)
> I wish I could finish  OR16sim in two days...
> I'm quite FINE with the trip :)

Great. ;-)

I think I'll go to San Jose around 20th April. ;-)

regards, Damjan