[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [oc] EEPROM Programmers using FPGAs? now its EPROM vs FLASH time

To: cores@opencores.org
Subject: Re: [oc] EEPROM Programmers using FPGAs? now its EPROM vs FLASH time
From: Pavel Korensky <pavelk@anet.cz>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 20:39:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <MABBKBJDMOPPBNOPHDKIEENGCDAA.paul.mcfeeters@ntlworld.com>
References: <200201071103.MAA03985@ds-00122.usz.ch>
Reply-To: cores@opencores.org
Sender: owner-cores@opencores.org

At 03:48 PM 1/7/02 +0000, you wrote:
>How easy is it to use FLASH? As easy as SRAM? What sort of access speeds
>do you get from them? And how much do typical units cost?

They costs approx. the same as EPROMs. Similar access speeds, identical
pinout as EPROMS etc. You just do not need to erase them with UV light.
They are eraseable and programmable electrically (+5 V).

Best regards

PavelK

--
To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

References:
- Re: [oc] EEPROM Programmers using FPGAs?
  - From: Daniel Haensse <daniel.haensse@alumni.ethz.ch>
- [oc] EEPROM Programmers using FPGAs? now its EPROM vs FLASH time
  - From: "Paul McFeeters" <paul.mcfeeters@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [oc] wishlist/todolist
Next by Date: [oc] non-profit organization
Prev by thread: [oc] EEPROM Programmers using FPGAs? now its EPROM vs FLASH time
Next by thread: Re: [oc] EEPROM Programmers using FPGAs? now its EPROM vs FLASH time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread