GNU 소프트웨어의 서기 2000년 문제 테스트 결과 목록

목 차

• 이 문서에 대한 정보
• 2000년 문제 테스트에 합격한 GNU 소프트웨어
• 이상이 없을 것으로 판단되는 GNU 소프트웨어
• 이상이 있는 것으로 판단되는 GNU 소프트웨어
• 테스트 되지 않은 GNU 소프트웨어

이 문서에 대한 정보

이 문서는 2000년 정보 및 준비 공개법에 의해서 보장된 서기 2000년 문제에 대한 GNU 소프트웨어들의 준비 상태를 담고 있으며, 2000년 문제에 대한 GNU 소프트웨어들의 이상 유무를 제공하는 참고 자료로 사용될 수 있을 뿐입니다. 따라서 이 문서는 FSF와 기타 GNU 소프트웨어의 저작권자들과 여러분 사이에 어떠한 형태의 제품 보증도 담보하지 않으며, 계약 및 법률적 요건도 구성하지 않습니다. FSF와 GNU 소프트웨어의 저작권자들은 이 문서의 내용으로 인한 어떠한 형태의 피해나 손실에 대해서도 법률적 책임을 지지 않는다는 사실에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

이 문서에서 제공되는 정보는 FSF가 아닌 쿠스 슈트 (Koos Schut)의 자원으로 만들어진 것이며, FSF는 이 결과에 대한 정확성 여부를 확인하거나 검증하지 않았습니다. 이 문서의 모든 내용은 쿠스 슈트의 도움으로 그의 Y2K 웹페이지에서 가져온 것입니다.

다음과 같은 방법을 통해서 이 문서를 보다 유용하게 만들 수 있습니다. 첫째, 여러분 중에서 이 문서에 포함되지 않은 GNU 소프트웨어에 대한 Y2K 정보를 갖고 있는 분이 있다면 쿠스 슈트에게 알려주시기 바랍니다. 둘째, 이 문서와는 무관하게 독립적으로 수행된 Y2K 테스트 결과를 갖고 있는 분이 있다면 역시, 쿠스 슈트에게 알려주시기 바랍니다. 2개의 자료를 종합하면 더욱 신뢰성 있는 정보를 얻을 수 있을 것입니다.

이 문서에서 언급되지 않은 패키지에 대한 2000년 문제 정보는 참고할 수 없는 것들이며, 각각의 패키지 이름 밑에 간단한 참고 사항을 적어 놓았습니다.

2000년 문제 테스트에 합격한 GNU 소프트웨어

• acct-6.3 (OK)
  Uses 4-digit year

• ae (OK)
  No suspect strings in sources

• aegis (OK)
  Lots of correct year manipulation

• apache-1.3 (OK)
  Claimed to be okay by the authors

• apache-1.3.3 (OK)
  Passed Y2K tests

• autoconf-2.10 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sources

• autoconf-2.12 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sources

• automake-1.0 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• automake-1.2 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• automake-1.4 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• bash-2.02 (OK)
  Uses ctime for prompt only

• bc-1.05 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• bison-1.24 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sources

• bison-1.25 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sources

• bison-1.27 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sources

• button-14.0 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• calc-2.02f (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• cfengine-1.4.12 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• clisp-1997.09.25 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• clx-5.02 (OK)
  LISP files

• cook-2.4 (OK)
  4-digit years

• cperf-2.1a (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• cvs-1.10 (OK last update 19991217)
  Claimed OK, passed Y2K tests

• ddd-2.0 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• dejagnu-1.3 (OK)
  Correct use of tm_year

• diffutils-2.7 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• dirent (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• dld-3.3 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• doschk-1.1 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• ed-0.2 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• elib-1.0 (OK)
  Only elisp functions which does no date manipulation

• emacs-20.3 (OK)
  Passed Y2K tests

• enscript-1.6.1 (OK)
  This update fixed the various year2000 problems

• es-0.9alpha1 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• f2c (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• findutils-4.1 (OK)
  Can do 4-digit years

• finger-1.37 (OK)
  Does simple date manipulation

• flex-2.5.2 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• flex-2.5.4a (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• fontutils-0.6 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• gawk-3.0.0 (OK)
  Can do 4-digit years

• g++-2.5.0 (OK)
  Does simple date-manipulation with tm_year

• gcc-2.7.2 (OK)
  

• gcc-2.7.2.1 (OK)
  

• gcc-2.7.2.2 (OK)
  

• gcc-2.8.0 (OK)
  No Year2000 problems found

• gcc-2.8.1 (OK)
  Passed Y2K tests

  Tested for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29

• gcl-2.2.2 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• gdbm-1.7.3 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code, passed Y2K tests

• gettext-0.10 (OK)
  Uses tm_year correctly

• gforth-0.3.0 (OK)
  Uses tm_year + 1900 correctly

• gforth-0.4.0 (OK)
  Uses tm_year + 1900 correctly

• ghostscript-5.10 (OK last update 19991217)
  Passed Y2K tests

• ghostview-1.5 (OK)
  Passed Y2K tests

• git-4.3.17 (OK)
  Correct tm_year usage

• glibc-crypt-2.0.6 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• glibc-localdata-2.0.6 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• gmp-2.0.2 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• gnans (OK)
  Makes no assumption of year < 2000

• gnuchess-4.0pl79 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• gnulogo-1.2 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• gnuplot-3.5 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• gnushlogi-1.2p03 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• gnussl-0.2.1 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• gperf-2.7 (OK)
  No date-manipulation

• grep-2.0 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• grep-2.1 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• groff-1.12 (OK last update 19991217)
  Y2k fixed.
• gst-115 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• gstep-core (OK)
  Correct usage of tm_year

• guile-1.2 (OK)
  Correct usage of tm_year

• guile-1.3 (OK)
  Correct usage of tm_year, passed Y2K tests

• gzip-1.2.4a OK
  Hardly any date-manipulation

• gzip-1.2.4 (OK last update 19991217)
  Difference with 1.2.4a is an email address, only, and it has passed Y2K tests

• hello-1.3 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• hp2xx-3.1.4 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• hurd-0.2 (OK)
  Some date manipulation, but alls seems okay

• hyperbole-4.01 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• id-utils-3.2 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• indent-1.9.1 (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• intlfonts-1.1
  No code with date manipulation

• ispell-3.1.20 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sourc code

• less-3.3.2 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sourc code, passed Y2K tests

• libobjects-0.1.19 (OK)
  Correct usage of tm_year

• libtool-1.2 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• lilypond-1.0.17 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• m4-1.4 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• malloc-? (OK)
  Doesn't do any date manipulation

• maxima-5.2 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• mcsim-4.2.0 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• miscfiles-1.1 (OK)
  No source code with date manipulation

• mm-1.07 (OK)
  Appears to be okay

• motti-1.0 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• mtools-3.8 (OK)
  Is tested: see http://www.tux.org/pub/tux/knaff/mtools/y2k.html

• netpbm-9403 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sourc code

• nethack-3.2.3 (OK last update 19991217)
  OK according http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K

• nethack-3.3 (OK last update 19991217)
  OK according http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K

• octave-2.0.13 (OK)
  Claimed to be OK

• para-0.27 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• patch-2.1 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sourc code

• patch-2.5 (OK)
  No suspect strings in sourc code

• perl-5.002_solaris (OK)
  Passed Y2K tests

• perl-5.004_04 (OK)
  Claimed to be OK, passed Y2K tests

• perl-5.005_02 (OK)
  Claimed to be OK passed Y2K tests

• perl-5.005_03 (OK)
  Claimed to be OK

• perl-5.005_04 (OK)
  Claimed to be OK

• pips-1.01 (OK)
  Uses 4-digit year

• ptx-0.4 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• rcs-5.5 (OK)
  Didn't find any year2000 bugs

• rcs-5.7 (OK)
  Didn't find any year2000 bugs

• samba-1.9.18p10 (OK last update 19991217)
  OK according http://www.us1.samba.org/samba/samba/docs/sambay2k.html

• screen-3.7.2 (OK)
  Checked

• sed-2.0.5 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• sed-3.01 (OK)
  No date manipulation

• sharutils-4.2.1 (OK 1999-10-25)
  Fixes the version-4.2 problems

  Tests the remote's touch command for a way to specify 20xx timestamps

• sh-utils-1.16 (OK)
  Thoroughly studied for year2000 bugs

• smalltalk-1.1.6 (OK)
  Is OK as of from version 1.5.beta2

• stooop-3.0.1 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• sudo-1.5 OK
  OK according http://www.courtesan.com/sudo

• texinfo-3.12 OK
  Uses tm_year correctly

• time-1.7 OK
  Very little date-manipulation

• textutils-1.19 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• textutils-1.22 (OK)
  No suspect strings in source code

• xaos-3.0 OK
  No date-manipulation

• xboard-4.0.2 OK
  Correct usage of tm_year + 1900

• xemacs-21.0 OK
  Claimed at http://www.xemacs.org/year2000.html

• xinfo-1.01.01 OK
  No date-manipulation

• xlogmaster-1.6.0 OK
  No date-manipulation

• xshogi-1.2p03 OK
  No year-manipulation

• zlibc-0.9e OK
  No date-manipulation

이상이 없을 것으로 판단되는 GNU 소프트웨어

• R-0.64.7 (??)
  Claimed at http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html

• andrew-toolkit-5.0.0 (??)
  Lots of date manupulation

• binutils-2.9.1 (??)
  Correct tm_year + 1900, awful lot of date-like code, tested for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29.

• cpio-2.4.2 (OK?)
  Uses some date manipulation, but appears okay

• emacs-20.2 (OK?)
  Lots of potential Year2000 problems, but seems mosly okay

• fileutils-3.16 (OK?)
  Lots of potential year2000 problems, but appears mostly okay

• fileutils-4.0 (OK?)
  Lots of potential year2000 problems, but appears mostly okay

• gawk-3.0.3 (OK?)
  Lots of tm_year manipulation, but appears okay

• gcal-2.40
  Awful lot of year manipulation

• glibc-2.0.6 (OK?)
  Lots of year manipulation, but appears mostly okay

• libg++-2.8.0 (OK?)
  Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay

• libstdc++-2.8.0 (OK?)
  Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay

• lynx-2.8
  Lots of strange year manipulation

• make-3.77
  Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay, tested for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29.

• make-3.76.1 (OK?)
  Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay

• mc-4.1 (OK?)
  Lots of year manipulation

• oleo-1.6 (OK?)
  Lot of year manipulation....is inconsistent about leap years. Problem will not appear in 2000 (might in 2400)

• pcl-gcl-2.1 (OK?)
  Lisp code, no date manipulation

• tar-1.12 (OK?)
  Lots of potential Year2000 code, but appears okay

• wget-1.5.3 (OK?)
  Lots of potential Year2000 code, but appears okay

이상이 있는 것으로 판단되는 GNU 소프트웨어

• cvs-1.8
  Claimed to have problems

• cvs-1.9
  Claimed to have problems

• dgs-0.5.0 NOT OK
  Mostly okay, but is having trouble in the ras2tif code

• ecc NOT OK
  Not OK for other reasons

• elm-2.4 NOT OK
  Did not pass Y2K tests

• enscript-1.4.0 NOT OK
  Assumes run_tm.tm_year to have two digits

• enscript-1.5.0 NOT OK
  Assumes run_tm.tm_year to have two digits

• exim-2.02 NOT OK
  Assumes years to be between 1990 and 2090

• g77-0.5.23 NOT OK
  Correct usage of tm_year. However, the IDATE (VXT) intrinsic returns a two-digit year. In 2000 it is supposed to return 0, but will return 100 instead. Programs printing that number as a two-digit field might therefore print "**" instead of "00", "01", etc. Version 0.5.24 will fix this, and it is already fixed in the egcs-1.1.2 version. More Y2K information on g77 is available.

• gnats-3.2 NOT OK
  Uses some strange date manipulation in getdate.c

• gnumach-1.1.3 NOT OK
  Strange date manipulations

• groff-1.11a NOT-OK (last update 19991217)
  Did not pass Y2K tests (common *roff family). These are rather harmless.

• inetutils-1.3b NOT-OK
  Replies to the ftp client with a 2 year date

• metahtml-5.09 NOT-OK
  Did not pass Y2K tests (heavy repairs required)

• perl-4.036 NOT-OK (last update 19991217)
  Newer version is claimed OK

• sharutils-4.2 NOT-OK (1999-10-29)
  Prints %2d, tm_year in shar.c, fixed in version 4.2.1

• smalltalk-1.1.5 NOT-OK
  uses 31 bit signed int which overflows in 2004

• nethack-3.2.2 NOT-OK (last update 19991217)
  writes records in %02d%02d%02d", lt->tm_year ... format

• tiff-3.4b035 NOT-OK
  Assumes 19xx years

• tiff-3.4b037 NOT-OK
  Assumes 19xx years

• X11R6 NOT-OK (last update 19991217)
  Did not pass Y2K tests

  xc/doc/specs/PEX5/SI/pex.macros Something here produces the year 19100. There is a patch which involves some cryptic typing for me (receiving patches in Windhoos-mail and trying to get them past firewalls and things does not seem to work).

테스트 되지 않은 GNU 소프트웨어

• acm
  

• automake-1.3
  Newer version is tested OK

• cxref
  

• dclshar
  

• djgpp
  

• dumb
  

• elisp
  

• emacs-19.29
  Newer version is OK

• emacs-20.0
  Newer version is OK

• emacs-lisp-intro
  

• ffcall
  

• fileutils-3.13
  Newer version is probably OK

• flexfax
  

• gamma
  

• gas
  

• gcc-vms
  

• gdb-4.16
  Too much date-like code for me to decide

• gdb-4.17
  Too much date-like code for me to decide

• generic-NQS
  

• geomview
  

• ghostscript-4.03
  Very obfuscated code, newer version is OK

• ghostview
  

• gimp
  

• gnat
  Theoretically OK (There is a commercial claim)

• gnuserv
  

• gpc
  

• grep-2.2
  Older version is OK

• groff-1.10
  No suspect strings in source code, *roff family has Y2K problems, newer version 1.11 is NOT-OK!

• guavac
  

• jarg400
  

• jargon
  

• karma
  

• leim
  

• lesstif
  

• libg++-2.7.1
  Newer version probably OK

• libg++-2.7.2
  Newer version probably OK

• libg++-2.8.1.1a
  Older version probably OK

• libstdc++-2.8.1
  Older version probably OK

• lily
  

• lout
  

• lpf
  

• makeinfo
  

• mandelspawn
  

• mkid
  

• mkisofs
  

• mule
  

• mutt
  

• nana
  

• net2-bsd
  

• netfax
  

• nihcl
  

• nvi
  

• oaklisp
  

• objective-c
  

• obst
  

• oops
  

• p2c
  

• pcl-gcl
  

• perl-5.002
  Newer version is claimed OK

• perl-5.003
  Newer version is claimed OK

• perlref
  

• phttpd
  

• plotutils
  

• prcs
  

• rc
  

• readline
  

• recode
  

• regex
  

• rsync
  

• rx
  

• saoimage
  

• scheme
  

• scm
  

• sh-utils-1.12
  Newer version is tested OK

• sipp
  

• smail
  

• sneps
  

• spell
  

• spinner
  

• superopt
  

• swarm
  

• tar-1.11.8
  Newer version is probably OK

• termcap
  

• termutils
  

• tex
  

• texinfo-3.7
  Newer version is tested OK

• texinfo-3.9
  Newer version is tested OK

• tile-forth
  

• ucblogo
  

• units
  

• uucp
  

• uuencode
  

• vera
  

• vm
  

• w3
  

• wdiff
  

• wget-1.5.1
  Newer version is tested as probably OK

• winboard
  

• windows32api
  

• wn
  

• xboard-3.6.2
  Newer version is tested OK

• xgrabsc
  

• xxgdb
  

• yale-T
  

• ygl
  

자유 소프트웨어 재단과 GNU 프로젝트에 대한 질문은 gnu@gnu.org로 보내주시기 바랍니다.

GNU에 대한 질문 이외에 홈페이지 자체에 대한 질문은 webmasters@gnu.org로 보내주시고, 그밖의 연락 방법에 대해서는 연락처 안내 부분을 참고하시기 바랍니다.

Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111, USA

저작권에 대한 본 사항이 명시되는 한, 어떠한 정보 매체에 의한 본문의 전재나 발췌도 무상으로 허용됩니다.

최근 수정일: 30 May 2000 tower