Re: [openrisc] Important or1k question...

["Damjan Lampret" <lampret@opencores.org>]

I see no reason why implementation shouldn't be able to have 64-bit VFPRs
and 32-bit GPRs. So the answer would be yes.

regards,
Damjan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Ziomkowski" <chris@asics.ws>
To: <bender@opencores.org>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:51 AM
Subject: [openrisc] Important or1k question...


> I'm trying to port the RTEMS operating system to the or1k
> architecture, and I need an answer to the following
> question:
>
> Is it allowed to have a 32 bit integer architecture with
> 64 bit double precision floating point?
>
> This is a very common configuration.
>
> Is the intention to support this?
>
> I need a definitive answer on this ASAP, as it is required
> to define the basic structures for the OS, and there are
> issues associated with this that need to be addressed,
> including possible changes to the specification.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris Ziomkowski
> chris@asics.ws
>
> P.S. Saying "yes" will imply that we need to address these
> issues now. Saying "no" will make it very difficult to add
> support for this retroactively if it is desired.
>
> _______________________________________________________
> www.asics.ws - Solutions for your ASIC needs
> --
> To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit
http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
>

--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml