[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pci] Re: [oc] Re: WISHBONE serial block transfer
Dear Stefan (and all),
I am a graduate student at Ege University in Turkey.
The thing I will do is a PCI DAQ Card.
We have bought the Altera pci_mt64 core two weeks ago.
I do not have an experience with Verilog/VHDL and the pci_core also pci.
I' ve begun working on this pci core last week and it is really hard to me.
So would you mind if I ask you for your help?
Best Regards,
Servan Uzun
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Bergström" <stb@viking2001.se>
To: <pci@opencores.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: SV: [pci] Re: [oc] Re: WISHBONE serial block transfer
I am working with the Altera core and I got some parts working now.
Have Fun
STB
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Isa Servan Uzun [SMTP:uzun@bornova.ege.edu.tr]
Skickat: den 26 april 2001 08:20
Till: pci@opencores.org
Ämne: Re: [pci] Re: [oc] Re: WISHBONE serial block transfer
Hi Jason,
Which PCI core did you purchase?
It is important for me because we've just purchased Altera' s PCI core and
I can' t cope with it.
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Silcox" <jsilcox@yahoo.com>
To: <pci@opencores.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 2:34 AM
Subject: [pci] Re: [oc] Re: WISHBONE serial block transfer
>
> First time I've said anything here, so please forgive me if I
> fall on my face...
>
> I've just finished working on a design with a PCI interface...
> We purchased a PCI core for use in the design and I was involved
> in connecting it to the internal blocks of the design...
>
> Burst writes were easy to handle as a Target... Just buffer the
> data and don't accept a PCI read command until all data has been
> released...
>
> Burst reads were a bit tricky, but if you really understand the
> PCI bus standard you'll see that a burst read and a single read
> are really no different....
>
> Basically you have 2 situations
> (for this example Initiator refers to the PCI device asking for
> the data, and Target refers to the PCI core...)
> 1) Initiator wants one DWORD... Operation is initiated and the
> Initiator immediately indicated that this is the last byte
> it needs by deasserting the FRAME PCI bus signal. If the
> Target doesn't abort the operation by asserting the STOP
> PCI bus signal, it puts the requested DWORD on the bus and
> asserts the TRDY PCI bus signal. The operation then completes.
>
> 2) Initiator wants more than one DWORD... The Initiator keeps
> the IRDY and FRAME PCI bus signals asserted as long as it
> needs more data (deasserting the IRDY signal to pause the
> operation if necessary). When the Target has a valid DWORD
> it asserts the TRDY PCI bus signal until the Initiator has
> asserted IRDY at the same time to acknowledge reception of
> the DWORD.
>
> The point is, if you don't have data immediately, it's OK...
> The Target has 16 PCI cycles to start the transfer and can
> issue a Target-Retry (Master ends current operation, but can
> retry later)...
>
> What happens on the WB bus will effect the performance of
> the PCI bus, but doesn't have to "indicate" a block transfer,
> since block and single DWORD transfers are the same to PCI...
>
> I guess I'm just making a point, not really answering the
> question asked...
>
> Although, I think I'll look over the WB spec and do a bit of
> thinking...
>
> Thanks for your time...
> ---
> Jason Silcox
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>