Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files

[rcc@jennic.com]

Excellent - any idea when this will be ready?

In the meantime, which do you think is more complete? UC 2.95.3 
version or OpenCores 3.2.3 version?

Thanks,

Robert

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Matjaz Breskvar <phoenix@o... > 
To: openrisc@o...  
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:24:21 +0200 
Subject: Re: [openrisc] FW: [ECOS] Harvard architecture MLT files 

> 
> 
> * Robert Cragie (rcc@j... ) wrote: 
> > On the same note, whilst it's good to see the efforts done by 
> Carlos and the 
> > University of Cantabria, surely it would be better to put 
> effort into 
> > maintaining the GCC 3.2.3 port as opposed to the old 2.95.3 
> port? I have 
> > just compiled the latest eCos successfully on GCC 3.2.3 port 
> (not run it yet 
> > though) but I'm wondering if UC's efforts need to be included 
> as well. Can 
> > anyone give me the status on this? 
> 
> Carlos needs gcc-2.95.3, so he is updating it and getting it into 
> sync 
> with opencores ABI,... but this is just the first step; we are 
> working 
> on integrating best parts of UC port and opencores port with intend 
> on 
> merging it into opencores gcc-3.4 (and also latest stable 
> reslease). 
> 
> regards, 
> p. 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml