1 Introduction

In this document, the user is presented with an analysis that DepecheR has been written to perform. There are lots of tweaks to this general outline, so the user is encouraged to read the help files for each function individually in addition. In cases where bugs are identified, feedback is most welcome, primarily on the github site github.com/theorell/DepecheR. Now let us get started.

2 Example data description

The data used in this example is a semi-synthedic dataset, consisting of 1000 cytotoxic lymphocytes from each of 20 individuals. These have been categorized into two groups, and after this, alterations have been added to the sizes of some cell populations in both groups. This means that the groups can be separated based onthe sizes of certain cell types in the data. And this excersize will show how to identify these, and tell us what markers that define the separating cell types in question.

Importantly, DepecheR does not provide any pre-processing tools, such as for compensation/spectral unmixing of flow cytometry files. The clustering function does have an internal algorithm to detect data with extreme tails, but this does not circumvent the need to transform flow- or mass cytometry data. This can be done using either commercially available software or with R packages, such as Biocpkg(“flowCore”) or Biocpkg(“flowVS”).

library(DepecheR)
data('testData')
str(testData)
## 'data.frame':    20000 obs. of  16 variables:
##  $ ids   : int  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
##  $ SYK   : num  11.2 21.3 23.7 22.1 24.8 ...
##  $ FcER1g: num  15.4 19.8 18.7 17.9 28.2 ...
##  $ CD16  : num  27.4 23.7 17.9 19.2 19.8 ...
##  $ CD57  : num  6.45 5.55 9.65 17.41 86.38 ...
##  $ EAT.2 : num  21.2 18.2 23.6 39.6 25.9 ...
##  $ CD4   : num  80.7 82.6 88.2 89.6 12.7 ...
##  $ TCRgd : num  17.5 21.6 20.2 29 14.3 ...
##  $ CD8   : num  21.2 17.6 16.4 -11.4 78.3 ...
##  $ iCD3  : num  88.9 86.7 82.7 90.6 87.6 ...
##  $ NKG2C : num  21.2 56.3 36.5 62.9 21.5 ...
##  $ CD2   : num  43.2 64.6 73.6 14.6 75.6 ...
##  $ CD45RO: num  34.9 34.1 27.3 59.5 22.5 ...
##  $ CD3   : num  83.3 90.7 91.5 103.4 76.2 ...
##  $ CD56  : num  21.1 39.7 28.3 15.5 69.5 ...
##  $ label : int  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...

As can be noted here, the expected input format is either a dataframe or a matrix with cells as rows and markers/variables as columns. This is in accordance with the .fcs file convention. In this case, however, the different samples (coming from donors) should be added to the same dataframe, and a donor column should specify which cells that belong to which donor. This setup is chosen to make the software available to more different kinds of data.

3 depeche clustering

With the depeche clustering function, all necessary scaling and parameter selection is performed under the hood, so all we have to do, when we have the file of interest in the right format, is to run the function on the variables that we want to cluster on.

testDataDepeche <- depeche(testData[, 2:15])
## [1] "Files will be saved to ~/Desktop"
## [1] "As the dataset has less than 100 columns, peak centering is applied."
## [1] "Set 1 with 7 iterations completed in 14 seconds."
## [1] "Set 2 with 7 iterations completed in 6 seconds."
## [1] "Set 3 with 7 iterations completed in 6 seconds."
## [1] "The optimization was iterated 21 times."
str(testDataDepeche)
## List of 4
##  $ clusterVector     : int [1:20000] 2 2 2 2 6 3 5 2 1 1 ...
##  $ clusterCenters    : num [1:8, 1:14] 0 0 0 40.2 0 ...
##   ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
##   .. ..$ : chr [1:8] "1" "2" "3" "4" ...
##   .. ..$ : chr [1:14] "SYK" "FcER1g" "CD16" "CD57" ...
##  $ essenceElementList:List of 8
##   ..$ 1: chr [1:3] "CD4" "NKG2C" "CD45RO"
##   ..$ 2: chr [1:5] "CD4" "iCD3" "NKG2C" "CD2" ...
##   ..$ 3: chr [1:3] "CD57" "CD8" "CD2"
##   ..$ 4: chr [1:10] "SYK" "FcER1g" "CD16" "CD57" ...
##   ..$ 5: chr [1:3] "CD57" "CD8" "CD45RO"
##   ..$ 6: chr [1:4] "CD57" "CD8" "CD2" "CD56"
##   ..$ 7: chr [1:6] "SYK" "FcER1g" "iCD3" "CD2" ...
##   ..$ 8: chr [1:4] "TCRgd" "CD2" "CD45RO" "CD56"
##  $ penaltyOptList    :List of 2
##   ..$ :'data.frame': 1 obs. of  2 variables:
##   .. ..$ bestPenalty: num 16
##   .. ..$ k          : num 30
##   ..$ :'data.frame': 11 obs. of  2 variables:
##   .. ..$ ARI   : num [1:11] 0.59 0.581 0.683 0.689 0.857 ...
##   .. ..$ nClust: num [1:11] 29.4 28 27.1 24.3 20.4 ...

As can be seen above, the output from the function is relatively complex. If the names of each list element is not suficiently self explanatory, see (?depeche) for information about each slot.

3.1 depeche function output graphs

Two graphs are part of the output from the depeche function.

3.1.1 Adjusted Rand Index as a function of penalty values

This graph shows how internally reproducible the results were for each of the tested penalties. An Adjusted Rand Index of 1 shows that if any random subset of observations is clustered two times, each observation will be assigned to the same cluster both times. Conversely, an Adjusted Rand Index of 0 indicates the opposite, i.e. totally random distribution. The adjustment in “Adjusted” Rand index takes the divering probabilities of ending up with a high or low overlap in the special cases of very few and very many clusters into consideration.

Adjusted Rand Index as a function of penalty values. Each value is based on at least 7 clustering pairs (DepecheR standard in a 8 core machine).

Adjusted Rand Index as a function of penalty values. Each value is based on at least 7 clustering pairs (DepecheR standard in a 8 core machine).

3.1.2 Cluster centers

This graph shows in a heatmap format where the cluster center is located for each of the markers that are defined for the cluster in question. A light color indicates a high expression, whereas a dark color indicates low or absent expression. Grey color, on the other hand, indicates that the cluster in question did not contribute to defining the cluster in question. In some cases, the results might seem strange, as a cluster might have an expression very close to the center of the full dataset, but this expression still defined the cluster. This is due to an internal, and for stability reasons necessary, effect of the algotihm: a specific penalty will have a larger effect on a cluster with fewer observations, than on a cluster with many observations.

Cluster center heatmap. Marker names on the x-axis, cluster numbers on the y-axis.

Cluster center heatmap. Marker names on the x-axis, cluster numbers on the y-axis.

4 tSNE generation

To be able to visualize the results, we need to generate a stochastic neighbor embedding for the same data as we used to generate the depeche clustering. Any tool that generates tSNE vector can be used for this purpose. Personally, I use the multicore version of the Rtsne implementation, but other versions, that do not require openMP, might be preferrable to some. If you want to use the openMP version on a mac, check this link.

library(Rtsne)
testDataSNE <- Rtsne(testData[,2:15], pca=FALSE)

5 Visualization of depeche clusters on tSNE

Now, we want to evaluate how the different clusters are distributed on the tSNE. To do this, we need to generate a color vector from the cluster vector in the testDataDepeche. This cluster vector is then overlayed over the tSNE, and to make things easier to interpret, a separate legend is included as well. The reason that the legend is in a separate plot is for making it easier to use the plots for publication purposes. For file size reasons, it has namely been necessary to use PNG and not PDF for the plot files.

NB! The resolution of the files normally generated by DepecheR is considerably higher than in this vinjette, due to size restrictions.

dColorPlot(colorData = testDataDepeche$clusterVector, xYData = testDataSNE$Y, 
           colorScale = "dark_rainbow", plotName = "Cluster")
## png 
##   2
Cluster distribution over the tSNE field.

Cluster distribution over the tSNE field.

6 Visualization of markers on tSNE

Here, we once again use the dColorPlot function, with different settings. Note that titles are included in this case. As they are then becoming embedded in the png picture, this is not the standard, for publication reasons. It is also worth noting, that nothing is printed to screen, but rather all graphics are saved as separate files.

dColorPlot(colorData = testData[2], xYData = testDataSNE$Y)
## png 
##   2
Example of one marker (SYK) distributed over the tSNE field.

Example of one marker (SYK) distributed over the tSNE field.

7 Density distribution of groups

Now, we are getting into separating the groups from each other. The first thing we want to do is to visually compare the densities of the groups. This is done in the following way. First, the density for all events are plotted. This is followed by plotting of the first and second group of individuals, but keeping the density contours from the full dataset.

densContour <- dContours(testDataSNE$Y)

dDensityPlot(xYData = testDataSNE$Y, plotName = 'All_events', 
             colorScale="purple3", densContour = densContour)
## png 
##   2
#Here the data for the first group is plotted
dDensityPlot(xYData = testDataSNE$Y[testData$label==0,], plotName = 'Group_0', 
             colorScale="blue", densContour = densContour)
## png 
##   2
#And here comes the second group
dDensityPlot(xYData = testDataSNE$Y[testData$label==1,], plotName = 'Group_1', 
             colorScale="red", densContour = densContour)
## png 
##   2
Distribution of events in the different groups.

Distribution of events in the different groups.

8 Separating groups from each other

Now, we have arrived at a crucial point: we are now going to see which clusters that separate the two groups from each other. There are three functions in the DepecheR package that can help us do this. The first one is the dResidualPlot.

dResidualPlot(
    xYData = testDataSNE$Y, groupVector = testData$label,
    clusterVector = testDataDepeche$clusterVector)
## png 
##   2

This function shows the difference on a per-group/per-cluster basis. This means that it is non-statistical, and thus applicable even if the groups consist of only one or a few samples each. However, it cannot distinguish between a rare but very pronounced phenotype and a common difference: i.e., an individual donor can be responsible for the full difference noted. To circumvent this, and to get some statistical inferences, two other functions are available: the dWilcox and the dSplsda. These functions have identical input, but where the former performs a Wilcoxon rank-sum test (also called Mann-whitney U test) on a per-cluster basis and thus results in multiple comparisons, the latter (based on sparse projection to latent structures (aka partial least squares) discriminant analysis) instead identifies the angle through the multi-dimensional datacloud created by the individual donor frequencies in each cluster that most optimally separates the groups. It then internally checks how well the groups are separated along this vector, and plots the clusters that contribute to this separation with colors relative to how well the groups are separated. As this method is a sparse version of the method, it, like depeche, only identifies clusters that contribute robustly to separating the clusters, and has its internal tuning algorithm to define how the penalty term should be set. For both methods, there are paired alternatives. In this case, however, the data is not paired, and thus, the normal methods will be used. The standard use of the methods are:

dWilcoxResult <- dWilcox(
    xYData = testDataSNE$Y, idsVector = testData$ids,
    groupVector = testData$label, clusterVector = testDataDepeche$clusterVector)
sPLSDAObject <- dSplsda(xYData = testDataSNE$Y, idsVector = testData$ids,
                        groupVector = testData$label, 
                        clusterVector = testDataDepeche$clusterVector)
## Saving 3 x 3 in image

## [1] "The separation of the datasets was perfect, with no overlap between the groups"

## [1] "Files were saved at /Users/jakthe/Labbet/GitHub/DepecheR/vignettes"

The object rendered by the dSplsda function is inherited from the mixOmics package. The object rendered by the dWilcox function is a matrix containing information about the cluster number, the median in each group, the Wilcoxon statistic, the p-value and a p-value corrected for multiple comparisons. In addition to the graphs, the dWilcox and the dSplsda functions also output result files. See ?dSplsda and ?dWilcox for more information.

Residual, Wilcoxon, sPLS-DA plots.

Residual, Wilcoxon, sPLS-DA plots.

When investigating the results from the sPLS-DA or the dWilcox analysis, it was clear that half of the clusters were highly significantly different between the groups in this case.

9 Visualization of defining markers for clusters.

This function is especially useful to view the cluster distributions for specific clusters of interest, such as the significant clusters from the previousstep. dViolins serves as a compliment to the cluster center heatmap (see step 2). In this function, the sparsityMatrix from the depeche run is used. The function will in addition to producing all the graphs also produce a hierarchy of folders where the graphs are placed.

dViolins(testDataDepeche$clusterVector, inDataFrame = testData, 
         plotClusters = 3, plotElements = testDataDepeche$essenceElementList)
## [[1]]
## png 
##   2
Example of the distribution of events in the four markers defining cluster 3.

Example of the distribution of events in the four markers defining cluster 3.

10 Summary

In this document, a typical analysis of a cytometry dataset is shown. There are however very many other possibilities with this package. One of the major ones is that it accuratly classifies scRNAseq data, and in that process reduces the complexity of the data up to 1000-fold, as very few transcripts actually define each cluster. For further information on how to do this, the reader is currently encouraged to read the publication connected to this package: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203247.