[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [openrisc] about or1ksim and rtems

To: openrisc@opencores.org, paul <paulw@mmail.ath.cx>
Subject: Re: [openrisc] about or1ksim and rtems
From: Marko Mlinar <markom@opencores.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:34:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3EEF29C5.2000706@mmail.ath.cx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306101612490.3776-307000@speed2.se.axis.com> <0d8301c3343f$787dcc00$ef01ed0a@flextronics.si> <3EEF29C5.2000706@mmail.ath.cx>
Reply-To: openrisc@opencores.org
Sender: owner-openrisc@opencores.org
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1

On Tuesday 17 June 2003 16:46, paul wrote:
> Hi
>
> What was used to develop Or1ksim? curious...
gcc, make... ;)

> Can it be updated and built automatically like the "ATS" scripts that
> build the toolchains?
note that or1ksim is needed to test the programs under ATS.

> Which is better, rtems or uclinux? (will have more softwares to run
> latter on.)
rtems is real time OS, uclinux is not. So you see the applications are quite 
different.

Marko


--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

References:
- Re: [openrisc] OR1200 ASIC Success probabilities.
  - From: Christian Melki <christian.melki@axis.com>
- Re: [openrisc] OR1200 ASIC Success probabilities.
  - From: "Damjan Lampret" <lampret@opencores.org>
- [openrisc] about or1ksim and rtems
  - From: paul <paulw@mmail.ath.cx>

Prev by Date: [openrisc] software multiplication
Next by Date: Re: [openrisc] is there a way to rebuild or1ksim from verilog source
Prev by thread: [openrisc] about or1ksim and rtems
Next by thread: [openrisc] Bugs fixed in new version of gcc for OpenRISC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread