Re: [ecc] RE:

[DianTN <diantn@yahoo.com>]

Well, I think this is a better task for a PLL.

Regards,


Dian.

--- Phil Chien <phil@mosart.com.tw> wrote:
> hi there,
> 
> I don't know where you see the sentence. But if you want to 
> generate a pure 64KHz ( I mean either rising or falling edge
> are correct), it's impossible by digital way.
> 
> I think "gapping" is just  "mask 1 cycle from 9 cycles" to achieve
> a non-ideal 64KHz.
> 
> Anyone has better idea?
> 
> regards,
> Phil
> 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/