From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Dec 1 05:04:21 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:04:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1D4KNL014456; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:04:20 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1D4I58031356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:04:19 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB1D461r014456; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:04:07 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1D0BuL029510 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:00:12 -0800 Received: from imag.imag.fr (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1D08KM030899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:00:10 -0800 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (pave.imag.fr [129.88.43.12]) by imag.imag.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB1D05sX017203; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:00:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from gandoliere.imag.fr ([129.88.43.136] ident=kowalski) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQnem-0001Xj-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:00:04 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:00:04 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nicolas.Kowalski@imag.fr To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: INBOX recent messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kowalski@gandoliere.imag.fr X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIII, Probability=5%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 1.285, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE -2.092' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello. I have a question regarding recent messages. When I open a folder other than INBOX, newly arrived messages are shown as 'recent'. When I go back to this folder after visiting some other, the previously mentionned messages are not recent anymore. Why isn't the same behaviour with INBOX ? Recent messages in it keep this state until I close my pine session. Opening other folders and going back to INBOX does not clear the 'recent' status. Any explanation ? Thanks. More info: - pine 4.58, - incoming-folders feature is on, - all folders including INBOX are located on an UW-IMAP 2002e server, using MBX format, - deliveries are done on the server with procmail+dmail, -- Nicolas -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Dec 1 07:59:13 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:59:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1FxCNL018850; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:59:12 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1Fx9WS032033 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:59:10 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB1FwnFe016082; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:58:49 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1FtCuL028164 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:55:12 -0800 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1FtBeV014661 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:55:12 -0800 Received: from eltanin (eltanin.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.20]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513A81E4D9 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:55:11 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:55:11 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: INBOX recent messages In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@eltanin X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=I, Probability=1%, Report='REFERENCES 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE -0.301, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT -0.832, IN_REP_TO -0.847, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION -1.628' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 Nicolas.Kowalski@imag.fr wrote: > Why isn't the same behaviour with INBOX ? Recent messages in it keep > this state until I close my pine session. Opening other folders and > going back to INBOX does not clear the 'recent' status. The INBOX is never closed during your Pine session. So there are no messages that are New but not seen since the last session, since it's the same session. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Dec 1 08:56:08 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:56:08 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1Gu8NL021682; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:56:08 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1Gu558005419 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:56:06 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB1GtuFe012160; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:55:56 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1GrbuL019886 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:53:37 -0800 Received: from imag.imag.fr (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1GrYeW026208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:53:36 -0800 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (pave.imag.fr [129.88.43.12]) by imag.imag.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB1GrWSR002647; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:53:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from gandoliere.imag.fr ([129.88.43.136] ident=kowalski) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQrIi-0005b8-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:53:32 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:53:32 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nicolas.Kowalski@imag.fr To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: INBOX recent messages In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kowalski@gandoliere.imag.fr X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=III, Probability=3%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 1.285, REFERENCES 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE -0.301, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT -0.832, IN_REP_TO -0.847, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION -1.628' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 Nicolas.Kowalski@imag.fr wrote: > > > Why isn't the same behaviour with INBOX ? Recent messages in it keep > > this state until I close my pine session. Opening other folders and > > going back to INBOX does not clear the 'recent' status. > > The INBOX is never closed during your Pine session. So there are no > messages that are New but not seen since the last session, since it's > the same session. I did not know this. Thanks. -- Nicolas From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Dec 1 09:13:32 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:13:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1HDWNL022643; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:13:32 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1HDT58006081 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:13:30 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB1HDHFe014474; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:13:17 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1HB8uL030216 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:11:09 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1HB7Pk014521 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:11:08 -0800 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:HFH/2JvN/Xl1IDtPjYWT4/K0mb4L1d0C@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB1HAunN359689; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:10:59 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:10:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Collapsing / Expanding all threads in a mailbox In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Shane Mitchell X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIII, Probability=5%, Report='REFERENCES 0, IN_REP_TO -0.847' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Shane Mitchell (fragile@skynet.ie) wrote in the pine-info list on Nov...: :) is there a command in Pine to collapse/expand all threads in a mailbox, :) when the current Sort view is threaded? Shane, You can use my "Fancy Thread Interface" patch. This patch enhances the thread interface and it allows you (among other things) to do this. To find the patch go to my web page, address below. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Dec 1 09:15:48 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:15:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1HFlNL022773; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:15:47 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1HFj58006238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:15:45 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB1HFZ1r011986; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:15:35 -0800 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1HDquL033238 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:13:52 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1HDp8Q025829 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:13:52 -0800 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:dIUOt23lCWVxCwkQ8MlktUkzxQQvN+1I@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB1HDnnN359758; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:13:50 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:13:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: how to get PINE to go to the FIRST new message? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Larry Rosenman X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIII, Probability=5%, Report='REFERENCES 0, IN_REP_TO -0.847' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Larry Rosenman (ler@lerctr.org) wrote in the pine-info list on Nov 26, 2003: :) I'd like to have pine go to the first (lowest numbered) "NEW" message :) in the folder when I pick a folder. Larry, For incoming folders you can press M S C and set: incoming-startup-rule = (*) first-recent If you want to set this on a per folder basis, you should press M S R O and set the folder and incoming-startup-rule to use. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Dec 1 11:11:46 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:11:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1JBjNL028896; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:11:45 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1JBhWS007444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:11:43 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB1JBXAk013234; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:11:33 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1J9WuL026688 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:09:32 -0800 Received: from lerami.lerctr.org (lerami.lerctr.org [207.158.72.11]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB1J9VeW028872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:09:31 -0800 Received: from lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net ([207.136.3.72]) by lerami.lerctr.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AQtQD-0001gM-8Y; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:09:25 -0600 Message-Id: <123630000.1070305764@lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:09:24 -0600 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Larry Rosenman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: how to get PINE to go to the FIRST new message? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========49124E516EA248117417==========" X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-PGP-Info: All other keys are old/dead. X-PGP-Key: 0x3c49bdd6 X-PGP-Fingerprint: D0D1 3C11 F42F 6B29 FA67 6BF3 AD13 4685 3C49 BDD6 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=II, Probability=2%, Report='HASHBUSTER_BLOCK 0, REFERENCES 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE -0.301, PGP_SIGNATURE_2 -0.708, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT -0.832, IN_REP_TO -0.847' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN --==========49124E516EA248117417========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Monday, December 01, 2003 09:13:49 -0800 Eduardo Chappa=20 wrote: > *** Larry Rosenman (ler@lerctr.org) wrote in the pine-info list on Nov > 26, 2003: > > :) I'd like to have pine go to the first (lowest numbered) "NEW" message > :) in the folder when I pick a folder. > > Larry, > > For incoming folders you can press M S C and set: > > incoming-startup-rule =3D > (*) first-recent > > If you want to set this on a per folder basis, you should press M S R O > and set the folder and incoming-startup-rule to use. AHHHHHHHHHHHHH! Thank You Eduardo! Didn't realize it was in the role(s) stuff. Makes life much nicer :-) LER > > Eduardo > http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ --=20 Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 --==========49124E516EA248117417========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/y5HkrRNGhTxJvdYRArWHAJ4rDvVnZOtZkQ3fbBMlU9/Sb0Qw4wCfWjCY 7lzIsiNo8oxoW9QUC5L3QMw= =ysGb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========49124E516EA248117417==========-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Dec 3 07:40:52 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:40:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB3FegNL031827; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:40:42 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB3FeeWS020048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:40:41 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB3FeQop013860; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:40:26 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB3FceuL033914 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:38:40 -0800 Received: from smtp1.iitb.ac.in ([203.199.51.149]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB3FcbKC026852 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:38:38 -0800 Received: (qmail 6307 invoked by uid 505); 3 Dec 2003 15:40:20 -0000 Received: from shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in by smtp1.iitb.ac.in by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.54. Clear:. Processed in 0.290335 secs); 03 Dec 2003 15:40:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ee.iitb.ac.in) (10.107.1.1) by smtp1.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 15:40:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (shivaji@localhost) by ee.iitb.ac.in (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id hB3FcYW7000757 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:08:35 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:08:34 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Shivaji Navale To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIII, Probability=5%, Report='IN_REP_TO -0.847' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, We have this peculiar problem for the Mailboxes of users /var/spool/mail/username. The mailboxes get corrupted asto the first 20-26 lines of mailbox get DELETED. I had gone through the doc on the pine site regarding the locking problme over NFS. how can this problem be overcome. Also we recently upgraded to pine-4.58, and on setting the domain-name=req_domain ,the domain name was still the hostname, instead of reqd_domain. We are using 2.4.20-18.8.um.1 kernel on the (LVS Director) which exports the mail partition to 30 NFS/NIS clients. This mail is similar to one i posted on NFS lists. Thanks -shivaji -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION -- A P J KALAM From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Dec 4 08:37:57 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:37:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4GbuUF018911; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:37:56 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4Gbslp011012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:37:54 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB4GbdAk012864; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:37:40 -0800 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4GaRuL034242 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:36:27 -0800 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4GaQRg031723 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:36:27 -0800 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4GaQ4l025274 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:36:26 -0800 Received: from shiva0.cac.washington.edu (shiva0.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4GaPvo002907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:36:26 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:36:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: snarfing via maildrop loses status flags - bug or feature? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Nancy, We will try to provide a feature to preserve state when snarfing in the next version of pine. Thanks for the explanation. Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Dec 4 09:11:10 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:11:10 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4HB5UF021064; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:11:05 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4HB272010537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:11:03 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB4HAqAk012936; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:10:52 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4HABuL037534 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:10:13 -0800 Received: from holly.csn.ul.ie (holly.csn.ul.ie [136.201.105.4]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB4HA6ED010715 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:10:10 -0800 Received: from skynet.csn.ul.ie (skynet [136.201.105.2]) by holly.csn.ul.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1DB9375E for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:09:51 +0000 (Eire) Received: by skynet.csn.ul.ie (Postfix, from userid 2542) id 537F8ED77; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:09:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skynet.csn.ul.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479167E97 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:09:51 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:09:51 +0000 (GMT) Reply-To: Shane Mitchell Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Shane Mitchell To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Collapsing / Expanding all threads in a mailbox In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: fragile@skynet X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:10:56 -0800 (PST) > From: Eduardo Chappa > To: Shane Mitchell > Cc: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: Collapsing / Expanding all threads in a mailbox > > *** Shane Mitchell (fragile@skynet.ie) wrote in the pine-info list on Nov...: > > :) is there a command in Pine to collapse/expand all threads in a mailbox, > :) when the current Sort view is threaded? > > Shane, > > You can use my "Fancy Thread Interface" patch. This patch enhances the > thread interface and it allows you (among other things) to do this. To > find the patch go to my web page, address below. > > Eduardo > http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ > Sweet, thanks.. -- Shane Mitchell so sing just like him, fuckers it won't offend him just me because he's dead -- Vedder '4/20/02' From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Dec 6 00:53:06 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 00:53:06 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB68r2UF013640; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 00:53:02 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB68r0lp020035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 00:53:00 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB68qoFe015710; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 00:52:50 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB68pXuL039486 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 00:51:34 -0800 Received: from smtp2.iitb.ac.in ([203.199.51.149]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB68pUZI007491 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 00:51:32 -0800 Received: (qmail 9777 invoked by uid 505); 6 Dec 2003 08:51:29 -0000 Received: from shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in by smtp2.iitb.ac.in by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.54. Clear:. Processed in 0.261557 secs); 06 Dec 2003 08:51:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ee.iitb.ac.in) (10.107.1.1) by smtp2.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 08:51:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (shivaji@localhost) by ee.iitb.ac.in (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id hB68pPaZ008721 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:21:27 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:21:25 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Shivaji Navale To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted --repost In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Pls could anyone help me/give some pointer. -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION -- A P J KALAM On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > Hi, > > We have this peculiar problem for the Mailboxes of users > /var/spool/mail/username. > The mailboxes get corrupted asto the first 20-26 lines of mailbox get > DELETED. > > I had gone through the doc on the pine site regarding the locking problme > over NFS. how can this problem be overcome. > > Also we recently upgraded to pine-4.58, and on setting the > domain-name=req_domain ,the domain name was still the hostname, instead of > reqd_domain. > > We are using 2.4.20-18.8.um.1 kernel on the (LVS Director) which exports > the mail partition to 30 NFS/NIS clients. > > This mail is similar to one i posted on NFS lists. > > > Thanks > -shivaji > > > -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity > for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION > -- A P J KALAM > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Dec 6 08:38:38 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:38:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB6GcbUF026226; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:38:37 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB6GcZlp029694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:38:35 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB6GcO1r013690; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:38:24 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB6GbYuL034502 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:37:34 -0800 Received: from cottonwood.uwyo.edu (cottonwood.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.27]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB6GbO2X023847 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:37:29 -0800 Received: from asuwlink.uwyo.edu (asuwlink.uwyo.edu [129.72.60.112]) by cottonwood.uwyo.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB6GbJV0026245; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:37:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jimkirk@uwyo.edu) Received: from asuwlink.uwyo.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by asuwlink.uwyo.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB6GbJM7018985; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:37:19 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (jimkirk@localhost) by asuwlink.uwyo.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id hB6GbIoK018975; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:37:19 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:37:18 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Roberts Kirkpatrick To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted --repost In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Shivaji Navale X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: asuwlink.uwyo.edu: jimkirk owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN One posibility is that you have disk quotas enabled, and users that bump into that get the corruption because the file cannot be rewritten correctly. Or, the disk volume is running out of room. On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > Pls could anyone help me/give some pointer. > > > -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity > for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION > -- A P J KALAM > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We have this peculiar problem for the Mailboxes of users > > /var/spool/mail/username. > > The mailboxes get corrupted asto the first 20-26 lines of mailbox get > > DELETED. > > > > I had gone through the doc on the pine site regarding the locking problme > > over NFS. how can this problem be overcome. > > > > Also we recently upgraded to pine-4.58, and on setting the > > domain-name=req_domain ,the domain name was still the hostname, instead of > > reqd_domain. > > > > We are using 2.4.20-18.8.um.1 kernel on the (LVS Director) which exports > > the mail partition to 30 NFS/NIS clients. > > > > This mail is similar to one i posted on NFS lists. > > > > > > Thanks > > -shivaji > > > > > > -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity > > for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION > > -- A P J KALAM > > > > > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Dec 6 10:31:58 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:31:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB6IVvUF028620; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:31:57 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB6IVtlp032054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:31:55 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB6IVk1r012730; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:31:46 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB6IUiuL014416 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:30:44 -0800 Received: from smtp1.iitb.ac.in ([203.199.51.149]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB6IUf2X009231 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:30:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 28096 invoked by uid 505); 6 Dec 2003 18:30:40 -0000 Received: from shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in by smtp1.iitb.ac.in by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.54. Clear:. Processed in 0.271451 secs); 06 Dec 2003 18:30:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ee.iitb.ac.in) (10.107.1.1) by smtp1.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 18:30:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (shivaji@localhost) by ee.iitb.ac.in (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id hB6IUZ5E022161; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:00:36 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:00:35 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Shivaji Navale To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted --repost In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: James Roberts Kirkpatrick X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, We donot have any disk quotas enabled on the /var/spool/mail partition. I did come to know from the docs on the site, that this kind of problem is due to appending of the mailbox, even while pine is holding the mailbox in NFS. This problem is flaring and many users complain of this mailbox errors. We had upgraded to pine4.58 now. How would this problem be overcome. thanks, shivaji -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION -- A P J KALAM On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, James Roberts Kirkpatrick wrote: > One posibility is that you have disk quotas enabled, and users that bump > into that get the corruption because the file cannot be rewritten > correctly. Or, the disk volume is running out of room. > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > > > > Pls could anyone help me/give some pointer. > > > > > > -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity > > for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION > > -- A P J KALAM > > > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We have this peculiar problem for the Mailboxes of users > > > /var/spool/mail/username. > > > The mailboxes get corrupted asto the first 20-26 lines of mailbox get > > > DELETED. > > > > > > I had gone through the doc on the pine site regarding the locking problme > > > over NFS. how can this problem be overcome. > > > > > > Also we recently upgraded to pine-4.58, and on setting the > > > domain-name=req_domain ,the domain name was still the hostname, instead of > > > reqd_domain. > > > > > > We are using 2.4.20-18.8.um.1 kernel on the (LVS Director) which exports > > > the mail partition to 30 NFS/NIS clients. > > > > > > This mail is similar to one i posted on NFS lists. > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > -shivaji > > > > > > > > > -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity > > > for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION > > > -- A P J KALAM > > > > > > > > > > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Dec 7 02:16:29 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:16:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB7AGQUF019183; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:16:26 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB7AGO72014355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:16:24 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB7AGDop013116; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:16:13 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB7AEvuL038442 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:14:57 -0800 Received: from msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.160]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB7AEqED008749; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:14:53 -0800 Received: from [213.78.83.252] ([213.78.83.252]) by msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id BIW88443; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:14:45 GMT Message-Id: Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:15:25 +0000 (GMT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: snarfing via maildrop loses status flags - bug or feature? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 4 Dec 2003 Steve Hubert (hubert@washington.edu) wrote: > Nancy, > We will try to provide a feature to preserve state when snarfing in the > next version of pine. Thanks for the explanation. Thank you very much -- I'm looking forward to it. If you need any help testing this (or any part of Pine), just ask! Thanks again, Nancy -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink ~ Deflexion & Reflexion ~ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Dec 7 02:31:17 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:31:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB7AVGUF019599; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:31:16 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB7AVElp019817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:31:15 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB7AV4Ak011426; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:31:04 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB7AUOuL028918 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:30:24 -0800 Received: from msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.160]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB7AUM2X030188 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 02:30:23 -0800 Received: from [213.78.83.252] ([213.78.83.252]) by msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id BIW91307; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:30:20 GMT Message-Id: Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:30:58 +0000 (GMT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted --repost In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > > > > > > > We have this peculiar problem for the Mailboxes of users > > > > /var/spool/mail/username. > > > > The mailboxes get corrupted asto the first 20-26 lines of mailbox get > > > > DELETED. > > > > > > > > I had gone through the doc on the pine site regarding the locking problme > > > > over NFS. how can this problem be overcome. > > > > > > > > We are using 2.4.20-18.8.um.1 kernel on the (LVS Director) which exports > > > > the mail partition to 30 NFS/NIS clients. On 7 Dec 2003 Shivaji Navale (shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in) wrote: > We donot have any disk quotas enabled on the /var/spool/mail partition. > I did come to know from the docs on the site, that this kind of problem is > due to appending of the mailbox, even while pine is holding the mailbox > in NFS. > > This problem is flaring and many users complain of this mailbox errors. > We had upgraded to pine4.58 now. > > How would this problem be overcome. I don't have experience with Pine and NFS but I have been reading the Pine discussion groups for years and I think the consensus is "Don't do that!" It is much more robust to set up an IMAP server and access those mailboxes via IMAP rather than using direct file access. When you built Pine, the UW imap daemon was also built so all you need to do is install it, turn it on, and change inbox-path to something like: inbox-path={your.imap.server/user=UID}INBOX and with luck, the corruption problems will be solved. Also, make sure that you read this FAQ which discusses the importance of /var/spool/mail having 1777 permission. Hope this helps, Nancy -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink ~ Deflexion & Reflexion ~ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Dec 8 13:31:13 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:31:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB8LVBUF026926; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:31:11 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB8LV9lp013223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:31:10 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB8LV1Fe016342; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:31:01 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB8LTnuL014366 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:29:49 -0800 Received: from serv.iaas.msu.ru (serv.iaas.msu.ru [212.192.224.252]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB8LTl2X017573 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:29:48 -0800 Received: from ppp-1-2.iaas.msu.ru (ppp-1-2.iaas.msu.ru [212.192.224.119]) by serv.iaas.msu.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB8LTgYA054699 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 00:29:44 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from master@iaas.msu.ru) Message-Id: <20031209002743.M527@atx.vid> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 00:30:11 +0300 (MSK) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Michail Vidiassov To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: IMAP alerts broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: master@atx.vid X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dear gurus, I run pine 4.58 on FreeBSD 4.9. When I try to access a user mailbox which is overquota, I receive the following error message: ---------------------------- *********************************************************** * What follows is an advisory message. After reading it * * simply hit "Return" to continue your Pine session. * * * * To review this message later, press 'J' from the * * MAIN MENU. * *********************************************************** Alert received while accessing "{host.domain}user.name": Alert received while accessing "{host.domain}user.name" ---------------------------- Note the repeated text. It is not a cut-n-paste error. I think that the problem is in the following piece of code from imap.c: else if(!strncmp(string, "[ALERT]", 7)) q_status_message2(SM_MODAL, 3, 3, "Alert received while accessing \"%.200s\": %.200s", (stream && stream->mailbox) ? stream->mailbox : "-no folder-", rfc1522_decode((unsigned char *)tmp_20k_buf, SIZEOF_20KBUF, string, NULL)); The problem is that tmp_20k_buf is used both by rfc1522_decode to store the decoded alert message from server and by q_status_message2 to sprintf the pine advisory message into. May be other OS's do not experience the bug, as their sprintf behaves differently. To get rid of the error one may use the second half of tmp_20k_buf to store decoded text: --- pine/imap.c.orig Thu May 8 21:32:18 2003 +++ pine/imap.c Mon Dec 8 19:26:38 2003 @@ -365,8 +365,8 @@ "Alert received while accessing \"%.200s\": %.200s", (stream && stream->mailbox) ? stream->mailbox : "-no folder-", - rfc1522_decode((unsigned char *)tmp_20k_buf, - SIZEOF_20KBUF, string, NULL)); + rfc1522_decode((unsigned char *)(tmp_20k_buf+10000), + SIZEOF_20KBUF-10000, string, NULL)); else if(!strncmp(string, "[UNSEEN ", 8)){ char *p; long n = 0; Sincerely, Michail -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Dec 8 17:09:07 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:09:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB9196UF005874; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:09:07 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB919572015246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:09:05 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB918uFe015906; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:56 -0800 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB918EuL016898 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:14 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB918DrQ018947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:13 -0800 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB918CP3023740 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:12 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB918Cvo015265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:12 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: IMAP alerts broken In-Reply-To: <20031209002743.M527@atx.vid> References: <20031209002743.M527@atx.vid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thanks, your fix will be in next version of Pine. Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Dec 9 06:10:20 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:10:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB9EAGUF029336; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:10:16 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB9EAE72001882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:10:14 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hB9EA5Fe016324; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:10:05 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB9E9CuL039446 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:09:12 -0800 Received: from serv.iaas.msu.ru (serv.iaas.msu.ru [212.192.224.252]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hB9E95Dv015502 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:09:06 -0800 Received: from serv.iaas.msu.ru (serv.iaas.msu.ru [212.192.224.252]) by serv.iaas.msu.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB9E8vDX083253 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:09:02 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from master@iaas.msu.ru) Message-Id: <20031209165101.U74732@serv.iaas.msu.ru> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:08:57 +0300 (MSK) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Michail Vidiassov To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: utime(3) related warnings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dear All, while compiling in a custom patch for pine 4.58 on FreeBSD 4.9, I have turned on warnings and noticed, that 1) utime function remains undeclared 2) when necessary files are included, compiler warns about passing arg 2 of `utime' from incompatible pointer type It seems to be caused by treating utime(3) according to the following declaration: #include utime(file, timep) char *file; time_t timep[2]; and not the modern (POSIX) one #include #include int utime(const char *filename, struct utimbuf *buf); While the methods seem to be binary compatible (it was a warning message only), why not to clean up the code a bit? Sincerely, Michail --- pico/osdep/os-bsf.h.orig Tue Dec 9 15:43:58 2003 +++ pico/osdep/os-bsf.h Tue Dec 9 15:42:33 2003 @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ #include #include #include +#include +#include +#include --- pine/adrbklib.c.orig Tue Nov 4 21:36:26 2003 +++ pine/adrbklib.c Tue Nov 4 21:40:31 2003 @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ /* copy ab->filename to ab->our_filecopy, preserving mtime */ if(ab->filename != ab->our_filecopy){ struct stat sbuf; - time_t tp[2]; + struct utimbuf tp; int valid_stat = 0; dprint(7, (debugfile, "Before abook copies\n")); @@ -957,8 +957,8 @@ } else{ valid_stat++; - tp[0] = sbuf.st_atime; - tp[1] = sbuf.st_mtime; + tp.actime = sbuf.st_atime; + tp.modtime = sbuf.st_mtime; } while((c = getc(fp_read)) != EOF) @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ (void)fclose(fp_write); fp_write = (FILE *)NULL; - if(valid_stat && utime(ab->our_filecopy, tp)){ + if(valid_stat && utime(ab->our_filecopy, &tp)){ q_status_message1(SM_INFO, 0, 3, "Error: can't set mtime for \"%.200s\"", (lc=last_cmpnt(ab->filename)) ? lc : ab->our_filecopy); -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Dec 10 01:08:41 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:08:41 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBA98eUF008115; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:08:40 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBA98clp011758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:08:38 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBA98SFe015280; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:08:29 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBA97IuL022906 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:07:19 -0800 Received: from smtp1.iitb.ac.in ([203.199.51.149]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBA97EDv017394 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:07:16 -0800 Received: (qmail 14319 invoked by uid 505); 10 Dec 2003 09:07:14 -0000 Received: from shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in by smtp1.iitb.ac.in by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.54. Clear:. Processed in 0.266844 secs); 10 Dec 2003 09:07:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ee.iitb.ac.in) (10.107.1.1) by smtp1.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 09:07:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (shivaji@localhost) by ee.iitb.ac.in (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id hBA979sL024191; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:37:10 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:37:09 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Shivaji Navale To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted --repost In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Nancy McGough X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thanks a lot, i got to know where the problem is now and how it can be resolved, after a long period of head cracking. thanks again to the GURU's at PINE regards, shivaji -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION -- A P J KALAM On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Nancy McGough wrote: > > > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > > > > > > > > > We have this peculiar problem for the Mailboxes of users > > > > > /var/spool/mail/username. > > > > > The mailboxes get corrupted asto the first 20-26 lines of mailbox get > > > > > DELETED. > > > > > > > > > > I had gone through the doc on the pine site regarding the locking problme > > > > > over NFS. how can this problem be overcome. > > > > > > > > > > We are using 2.4.20-18.8.um.1 kernel on the (LVS Director) which exports > > > > > the mail partition to 30 NFS/NIS clients. > > On 7 Dec 2003 Shivaji Navale (shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in) wrote: > > We donot have any disk quotas enabled on the /var/spool/mail partition. > > I did come to know from the docs on the site, that this kind of problem is > > due to appending of the mailbox, even while pine is holding the mailbox > > in NFS. > > > > This problem is flaring and many users complain of this mailbox errors. > > We had upgraded to pine4.58 now. > > > > How would this problem be overcome. > > > I don't have experience with Pine and NFS but I have been reading > the Pine discussion groups for years and I think the consensus is > "Don't do that!" It is much more robust to set up an IMAP server > and access those mailboxes via IMAP rather than using direct file > access. When you built Pine, the UW imap daemon was also built so > all you need to do is install it, turn it on, and change > inbox-path to something like: > > inbox-path={your.imap.server/user=UID}INBOX > > and with luck, the corruption problems will be solved. > > Also, make sure that you read this FAQ > > > > which discusses the importance of /var/spool/mail having 1777 > permission. > > Hope this helps, > Nancy > > -- > Nancy McGough > Infinite Ink ~ > Deflexion & Reflexion ~ > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Dec 10 15:53:52 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:53:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBANrpUF011117; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:53:52 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBANro72001248 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:53:50 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBANrcAk005314; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:53:38 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBANqbuL023588 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:52:37 -0800 Received: from its-ballista.marqnet.mu.edu (its-ballista.marqnet.mu.edu [134.48.20.169]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBANqaZI012239 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:52:36 -0800 Received: from EMARQ1.marqnet.mu.edu ([134.48.20.156] RDNS failed) by its-ballista.marqnet.mu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:52:36 -0600 Received: from [192.168.254.5] ([134.48.206.27]) by EMARQ1.marqnet.mu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:52:35 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:52:28 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Miller To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: unable to add incoming pop3 folder MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jamtat@debian-box X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2003 23:52:36.0007 (UTC) FILETIME=[AFA14B70:01C3BF78] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I hope I'm sending this message to the right place: I don't have my address book with me here at this computer, or any recent messages from the list on the mail server. Anyway, if it is, the following request: I am trying to add as an incoming folder a pop3 server where I need to check mail. This is under Pine 4.58 (Debian Sid - sshh! don't tell). I've enabled incoming folders, and have 3 imap folders there working without a hitch. Somehow the pop3 server is uncooperative. I've actually run into this problem under Pine with this same server previously, but adding the folder seemed to eventually work itself out after several attempts (not sure how or why it finally worked - I assume the server must operate in some strange way, since I didn't do anything differently when it finally did work). So, I've been trying all day. In the folder list window I hit "a", then type my.popserver.addy/user=myuname/pop3 when asked "name of server to contain added folder." When asked "folder on 'my.popserver.addy' to add" I type "INBOX." Then I give it a name when asked for "nickname for folder 'INBOX'". After hitting "return" after this, I immediately get the message "Error checking for {my.popserver.addy/user=myuname/pop3}INBOX". It's like it doesn't even go to the mailserver to check, but just immediately gives that message. Could it somehow be remembering a previously failed attempt, that perhaps had some error in it, rather than checking again with the new values? Is there some way in which I'm not entering values correctly? I've gone over this many times today, and I can't have entered incorrect values (according to the info I've been reading, e.g., at Infinite Ink) *every* time. I entered those values carefully, using the model I found on that website. I also compared it to .pinerc on another machine I have here that successfully checks the pop3 server in question using Pine 4.21 (just checked it earlier today with that machine). I just can't see how it could be user error in this case. If I leave off "pop3" it does go to check, but of course times out since it's requesting on port 143 and this is a pop server. Could anyone please help out with this problem? Thanks, James -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Dec 11 09:05:28 2003 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:05:28 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBH5RUF009643; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:05:27 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBH5P72028145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:05:26 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBH5AFe005266; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:05:11 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBH3iuL032054 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:03:45 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBH3hgN032348 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:03:43 -0800 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBBH3fnN337418; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:03:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:03:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: unable to add incoming pop3 folder In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: James Miller X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** James Miller (jamtat@mailsnare.net.nspm) wrote in the pine-info list on...: :) I am trying to add as an incoming folder a pop3 server where I need to :) check mail. :) [...] :) I've enabled incoming folders, and have 3 imap folders there working :) without a hitch. Somehow the pop3 server is uncooperative. James, You've found a bug!. The only way in which you can add this folder is by editing the ".pinerc" file. You will have to add the definition under the incoming-folders variable. Follow the pattern of the other imap folders to add your pop3 folder. I have a patch if you want to try it too. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:13:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKDWUF017946; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:13:32 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKDT72003341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:13:30 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBKDCop013060; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:13:12 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKCWuL032208 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:12:33 -0800 Received: from smtp1.iitb.ac.in ([203.199.51.149]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBKCTDv027263 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:12:30 -0800 Received: (qmail 17424 invoked by uid 505); 11 Dec 2003 20:12:28 -0000 Received: from shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in by smtp1.iitb.ac.in by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.54. Clear:. Processed in 0.266627 secs); 11 Dec 2003 20:12:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ee.iitb.ac.in) (10.107.1.1) by smtp1.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 11 Dec 2003 20:12:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (shivaji@localhost) by ee.iitb.ac.in (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id hBBKCMcE024241; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:42:25 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:42:22 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Shivaji Navale To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Nancy McGough X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, Sorry for bothering you again. As I am currently busy with my acads due to deadlines, i would appreciate if my query relating to imap is satisfied. Does having IMAP over mailboxes over NFS provide better locking as compared to pine directly accessing mailboxes (w/o imap) on NFS clients. Exporting the mails over NFS to 4 clients (load sharing servers) then doing a imap only connection to these mailboxes, rather than directly accessing inboxes from pine. This would allow me to give a final thought on deciding to revoke the mail partiton over NFS completely. And making users re-enter passwd after login for accessing mails via imap in pine. eagerly waiting for ur reply. thanks, shivaji -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION -- A P J KALAM On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > Thanks a lot, i got to know where the problem is now and how it can be > resolved, after a long period of head cracking. > > thanks again to the GURU's at PINE > > regards, > shivaji > > -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity > for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION > -- A P J KALAM > > On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Nancy McGough wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > We have this peculiar problem for the Mailboxes of users > > > > > > /var/spool/mail/username. > > > > > > The mailboxes get corrupted asto the first 20-26 lines of mailbox get > > > > > > DELETED. > > > > > > > > > > > > I had gone through the doc on the pine site regarding the locking problme > > > > > > over NFS. how can this problem be overcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > We are using 2.4.20-18.8.um.1 kernel on the (LVS Director) which exports > > > > > > the mail partition to 30 NFS/NIS clients. > > > > On 7 Dec 2003 Shivaji Navale (shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in) wrote: > > > We donot have any disk quotas enabled on the /var/spool/mail partition. > > > I did come to know from the docs on the site, that this kind of problem is > > > due to appending of the mailbox, even while pine is holding the mailbox > > > in NFS. > > > > > > This problem is flaring and many users complain of this mailbox errors. > > > We had upgraded to pine4.58 now. > > > > > > How would this problem be overcome. > > > > > > I don't have experience with Pine and NFS but I have been reading > > the Pine discussion groups for years and I think the consensus is > > "Don't do that!" It is much more robust to set up an IMAP server > > and access those mailboxes via IMAP rather than using direct file > > access. When you built Pine, the UW imap daemon was also built so > > all you need to do is install it, turn it on, and change > > inbox-path to something like: > > > > inbox-path={your.imap.server/user=UID}INBOX > > > > and with luck, the corruption problems will be solved. > > > > Also, make sure that you read this FAQ > > > > > > > > which discusses the importance of /var/spool/mail having 1777 > > permission. > > > > Hope this helps, > > Nancy > > > > -- > > Nancy McGough > > Infinite Ink ~ > > Deflexion & Reflexion ~ > > > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:34:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKYPUF018926; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:34:25 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKYN72004002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:34:23 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBKYBFe012524; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:34:12 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKXVuL023614 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:33:31 -0800 Received: from its-ballista.marqnet.mu.edu (its-ballista.marqnet.mu.edu [134.48.20.169]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKXTf0017036 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:33:30 -0800 Received: from EMARQ1.marqnet.mu.edu ([134.48.20.156] RDNS failed) by its-ballista.marqnet.mu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:33:29 -0600 Received: from [192.168.254.5] ([134.48.206.27]) by EMARQ1.marqnet.mu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:33:28 -0600 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:33:26 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Miller To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: unable to add incoming pop3 folder In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamtat@debian-box X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2003 20:33:29.0007 (UTC) FILETIME=[091383F0:01C3C026] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > James, > > You've found a bug!. Ahhh. Yet another accomplishment to add to my resume :) The only way in which you can add this folder is by > editing the ".pinerc" file. You will have to add the definition under the > incoming-folders variable. Follow the pattern of the other imap folders to > add your pop3 folder. I have a patch if you want to try it too. > I finally decided to just copy over relevant portions of the .pinerc file from the working Pine/pop install I have. That solved the problem, along similar lines you have suggested here. So, I guess I won't be needing the patch. Thanks for your response. Sincerely, James From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:50:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKobUF019735; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:50:37 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKoXlp011767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:50:33 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBKoNFe012836; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:50:23 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKnfuL018478 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:49:41 -0800 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBKncED009688 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:49:38 -0800 Received: from eltanin (eltanin.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.20]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750FD1E4D9; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:49:27 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:49:25 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Shivaji Navale X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@eltanin X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > Does having IMAP over mailboxes over NFS provide better locking as > compared to pine directly accessing mailboxes (w/o imap) on NFS > clients. Putting mailboxes on an NFS-mounted partition is bad in almost every case. The exceptions are if there is only one client accessing the mailbox across NFS (in which case why is it on NFS in the first place?) or sometimes if you are running Solaris, where file locking across NFS might occasionally work (with a modern NFS client that does the right thing, and a modern NFS server that does too). Too risky. Don't do it. Or use Maildir (yuck) on NFS, but that's a whole 'nother can of worms. Courier IMAP (yuck2) does Maildirs fine, but doesn't do IMAP very well. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:01:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBL1pUF020227; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:01:51 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBL1n72005027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:01:49 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBL1eAk014680; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:01:40 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBL1BuL026144 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:01:12 -0800 Received: from smtp1.iitb.ac.in ([203.199.51.149]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBL18f0025467 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:01:10 -0800 Received: (qmail 21327 invoked by uid 505); 11 Dec 2003 21:01:07 -0000 Received: from shivaji@ee.iitb.ac.in by smtp1.iitb.ac.in by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.54. Clear:. Processed in 0.25888 secs); 11 Dec 2003 21:01:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ee.iitb.ac.in) (10.107.1.1) by smtp1.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 11 Dec 2003 21:01:07 -0000 Received: from localhost (shivaji@localhost) by ee.iitb.ac.in (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) with ESMTP id hBBL145P025117; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:31:04 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:31:04 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Shivaji Navale To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Gopi Sundaram X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, thanks. Made up my mind now to have imap only access of mailboxes on the NIS/NFS clients. Is there anyway the user's doesnot have to re-enter the same login passwd after being logged in to the system, to access his mailbox via imap in pine. Explaining this if i would have not made by point my clear. Since we have users login into NIS/NFS clients and the pine therein would be configured to have inbox over imap (as told by Nancy). But then the user would have to re-enter his passwd to access his inbox. It would be better if there is a soln or we can still live with the double passwd's. thanks shivaji -- EVERYONE should contribute to THE BEST of their capacity for THE DEVELOPMENT of THE NATION -- A P J KALAM On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > > > Does having IMAP over mailboxes over NFS provide better locking as > > compared to pine directly accessing mailboxes (w/o imap) on NFS > > clients. > > Putting mailboxes on an NFS-mounted partition is bad in almost every > case. The exceptions are if there is only one client accessing the > mailbox across NFS (in which case why is it on NFS in the first place?) > or sometimes if you are running Solaris, where file locking across NFS > might occasionally work (with a modern NFS client that does the right > thing, and a modern NFS server that does too). > > Too risky. Don't do it. > > Or use Maildir (yuck) on NFS, but that's a whole 'nother can of worms. > Courier IMAP (yuck2) does Maildirs fine, but doesn't do IMAP very well. > > -- > Gopi Sundaram > http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:17:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBMHDUF023699; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:17:13 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBMHB72007661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:17:12 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBMH1Fe012632; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:17:02 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBMGJuL026756 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:16:19 -0800 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBMGE2X021381 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:16:18 -0800 Received: from eltanin (eltanin.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.20]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F031E4D9; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:16:13 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:16:13 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: inbox gets corrupted In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Shivaji Navale X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@eltanin X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Shivaji Navale wrote: > Is there anyway the user's doesnot have to re-enter the same login > passwd after being logged in to the system, to access his mailbox via > imap in pine. Read about pre-authenticated IMAP sessions using rsh or ssh, or the PASSFILE option. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:32:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBMWBUF024299; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:32:11 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBMW972008209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:32:10 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBBMVw1r014824; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:31:58 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBMVYuL030662 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:31:34 -0800 Received: from nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (nwkea-mail-2.sun.com [192.18.42.14]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBBMVWED006827 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:31:33 -0800 Received: from centralmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM ([129.147.62.1]) by nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBBMVWxA015415 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from tutelage.Central.Sun.COM (tutelage.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.51.9]) by centralmail1brm.Central.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id hBBMVWmU007521 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:31:32 -0700 (MST) Received: from tutelage.Central.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tutelage.Central.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBBMVWug053273 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:31:32 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (bhunter@localhost) by tutelage.Central.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id hBBMVVN9053270 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:31:31 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:31:31 -0700 (MST) Reply-To: Bill Hunter Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bill Hunter To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: incomplete SecBuffer exceeds maximum buffer size MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: tutelage.Central.Sun.COM: bhunter owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: bhunter@tutelage X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have seen the threads on this, and have set the "quell-ssl-largeblocks" feature on 4.58 (running on WinXP Home), but I still get the error message. Does this mean the feature is not behaving as hoped? I know there is a Microsoft issue at the heart of this (from the prior threads), but am curious still why other clients (Mozilla specifically) seems to work? Also, is there any way to apply the alleged Win2k fix to WinXP? Thanks, Bill -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:49:00 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBCKmxUF002996; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:48:59 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBCKmv72013238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:48:58 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBCKmkop014168; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:48:46 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBCKlYuL022726 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:47:34 -0800 Received: from griffon26.kfk4ever.com (griffon26.demon.nl [82.161.57.89]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBCKlWDv030584 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:47:33 -0800 Received: by griffon26.kfk4ever.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5CFA1A0CD74; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:47:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by griffon26.kfk4ever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58428E0B88D for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:47:03 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:47:03 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: griffon26@griffon26.kfk4ever.com To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Extra checks on maildrivers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I know that the maildir maildriver is not officially supported, but I only mention it because it pointed out some things in pine that I think can be improved. I've been experiencing crashes when TAB-ing to other folders to see new messages. After some debugging here's what I found: When TAB-ing to the next folder, mail_status() is invoked. That function returns SAFE_STATUS (dtb,stream,mbx,flags); SAFE_STATUS is #defined as (*dtb->status) (stream,mbx,flags) and the maildir driver has this in its driver struct: NIL, /* status of mailbox */ resulting in a call to a NULL function pointer. I think that there are 2 reasons that this caused a problem at all. 1) The maildir driver does not implement the status function. This is not really important for the people on this list I suppose, I'll take this up with someone else. 2) Pine does not always check if the maildriver functions that it uses are actually defined in the maildriver structure. It does in the case of the subscribe function: return factory ? (factory->subscribe ? (*factory->subscribe) (stream,mailbox) : sm_subscribe (mailbox)) : NIL; But not in the case of status (and several other functions): if (!dtb) return NIL; /* only if valid */ if (stream && ((dtb != stream->dtb) || ((dtb->flags & DR_LOCAL) && strcmp (mbx,stream->mailbox) && strcmp (mbx,stream->original_mailbox)))) stream = NIL; /* stream not suitable */ return SAFE_STATUS (dtb,stream,mbx,flags); I can imagine that maildrivers are _required_ to implement some functions, but the least pine could do is check these function pointers _at_startup_ and give a decent error message if it's NIL, so maildriver programmers know immediately what's wrong. For all functions that are optional (i.e. the rest of them), pine should check if they are implemented _before_using_them_. Am I making sense? =] Best regards, Maurice van der Pot -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:16:06 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBD0G6UF012543; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:16:06 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBD0G3lp027965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:16:04 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBD0Fsop016210; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:15:54 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBD0EtuL034368 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:14:55 -0800 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBD0Esf0019787 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:14:54 -0800 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBD0EsLh027681 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:14:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from scv1.apple.com (scv1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:14:51 -0800 Received: from ackema2.apple.com (ackema2.apple.com [17.202.14.81]) by scv1.apple.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBD0EGwx021693 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:14:16 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:14:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: not displaying attachment for signatures? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there any way that I can have some attachments skipped in the display? I know this is a strange request, but for some reason it bugs me to see [ Part 2, Application/PKCS7-SIGNATURE 3.2KB. ] [ Cannot display this part. Press "V" then "S" to save in a file. ] in messages.. I guess because other attachments I actually care about (e.g. attached files), and these ones I don't. Basically I guess I'd like to be able to filter out the display of certain attachments (though when I go to the view attachments screen, of course I'd want to see everything). -- top-posting: It's just a bad idea. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:18:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBP8IBUF027522; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:18:11 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBP8I972029423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:18:10 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBP8GUFe005262; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:16:30 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBP8CMuL014608 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:12:22 -0800 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (qmail.qwestip.net [205.171.7.14]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBP8CLZI020570 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:12:21 -0800 Received: (qmail 8164 invoked from network); 25 Dec 2003 08:12:28 -0000 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (HELO qmail) ([205.171.7.14]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail.qwestip.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Dec 2003 08:12:28 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:12:28 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Asif Iqbal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Calendar MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: iqbala@qmail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi All I am using {localhost:1234}INBOX as my INBOX. How do I add stuff in the calendar and also get reminder alert in pine ? Any help/suggestion would be greatly appreciated Thanks -- Asif Iqbal http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B686E08 There's no place like 127.0.0.1 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:23:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBP8NDUF027643; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:23:13 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBP8NAlp012557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:23:11 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBP8LZop011052; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:21:35 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBP8DOuL042658 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:13:24 -0800 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (qmail.qwestip.net [205.171.7.14]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBP8DMDv019820 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:13:23 -0800 Received: (qmail 8384 invoked from network); 25 Dec 2003 08:13:29 -0000 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (HELO qmail) ([205.171.7.14]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail.qwestip.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Dec 2003 08:13:29 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 03:13:29 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Asif Iqbal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Addition to the Dictionary MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: iqbala@qmail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi All I am using the spell check in pine. How do I now add words so it won't always find it as a misspell ? Thanks -- Asif Iqbal http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B686E08 There's no place like 127.0.0.1 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 04:50:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPCoWUF003869; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 04:50:32 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPCoTlp018132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 04:50:29 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBPCmtFe012144; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 04:48:56 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPCjDuL052156 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 04:45:13 -0800 Received: from natsmtp00.webmailer.de (natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPCjBbc013461 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 04:45:12 -0800 Received: from localhost (ACB7C215.ipt.aol.com [172.183.194.21]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBPCj8lt007387; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 13:45:08 +0100 (MET) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0268F59CF8F; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 10:14:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B8C59CF53; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 10:14:07 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 10:14:04 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Addition to the Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Asif Iqbal X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.local X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XII, Probability=12%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Asif Iqbal wrote: > I am using the spell check in pine. How do I now add words so it won't always > find it as a misspell ? This depends on the spell check application, which is not part of Pine. Pine just calles it. Claus From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:55:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPEtjUF006720; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:55:45 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPEtflp020783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:55:42 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBPEs71r015736; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:54:08 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPEoduL034536 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:50:39 -0800 Received: from ha-smtp1.tiscali.nl (ha-smtp1.tiscali.nl [195.241.76.187]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPEoYbc026805 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:50:38 -0800 Received: from [195.240.253.199] (unknown [195.240.253.199]) by ha-smtp1.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6671344AE; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 15:50:31 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 15:49:34 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bruce Cohen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: workaround for messages from Pine blocked? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum , pine@cac.washington.edu X-X-Sender: cohenb@pop3-2.tiscali.nl X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='PORN_4 0.789, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Does anyone have any idea for a workaround for the following situation? I am starting to get bounces from a couple of addresses to which I regularly send messages with no problems in the past. I think that the respective providers have recently installed spam blockers which think that I am spam. One of the reasons is possibly that the address I use (cohenb@worldonline.nl) no longer matches the names for the various servers at the provider (xxxxx.tiscali.nl: worldonline was bought by tiscali a couple of years ago, but the worldonline.nl addresses are kept active). If I change my sending address to cohenb@tiscali.nl mail seems to go through with no problems, but I would like a different workaround if possible, as I would like to keep the old email address. Is there something I can add to the header in Pine to satisfy whatever RCPT TO these spam checkers are looking for? Both error messages follow: Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host smtp.chello.nl[213.46.243.2] said: 551 Mail from your IP address is currently blocked based on RBL listing (in reply to RCPT TO command) Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host mx.dds.nl[213.204.195.153] said: 451 Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.241.76.186 (in reply to RCPT TO command) Any ideas? Thanks Bruce Cohen -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:39:08 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPFd7UF007688; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:39:07 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPFd5lp021690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:39:05 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBPFbVop016208; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:37:31 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPFYEuL031908 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:34:14 -0800 Received: from aslan.narnia.pp.se (aslan.narnia.pp.se [212.247.3.100]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPFYBSn016763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:34:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.narnia.pp.se (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBPFY9s4021137; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:34:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mats@dufberg.se) Message-Id: <20031225163112.U16254@aslan.narnia.pp.se> Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:34:09 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: workaround for messages from Pine blocked? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: dufberg@aslan.narnia.pp.se X-To: Bruce Cohen X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Dec 25, 2003, 15:49 (+0100) Bruce Cohen wrote: > Is there something I can add to the header in Pine to satisfy whatever > RCPT TO these spam checkers are looking for? > > Both error messages follow: > > > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host smtp.chello.nl[213.46.243.2] said: 551 > Mail from your IP address is currently blocked based on RBL listing > (in reply to RCPT TO command) > > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host mx.dds.nl[213.204.195.153] said: 451 Blocked - see > http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.241.76.186 (in reply to RCPT TO > command) Have you looked at ? Is 195.241.76.186 a fixed address of yours or do you get is dynamically? In the firs case you should check your system and scrutinize what you have sent, in the latter case you should contact you ISP and report the problem and require that you get a new IP address. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:19:10 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGJ9UF008524; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:19:09 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGJ772006956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:19:07 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBPGHWFe010784; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:17:32 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGDtuL022818 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:13:55 -0800 Received: from cinemaspace.berkeley.edu (cinemaspace.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.100.206]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGDsf1029988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:13:54 -0800 Received: from cinemaspace.berkeley.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cinemaspace.berkeley.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBPGD4u4023407; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:13:04 -0800 Received: (from aagha@localhost) by cinemaspace.berkeley.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBPGD3Wt023405; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:13:03 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:13:03 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: ama-list@mltp.com Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aurangzeb M. Agha" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Addition to the Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-cinemaspace.berkeley.edu-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-cinemaspace.berkeley.edu-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-To: Asif Iqbal X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: aagha@cinemaspace.berkeley.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN When you're doing spell-check, hit the letter 'a' (add) on a word which comes up mis-spelled so it doesn't come up next time. Aurangzeb On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Asif Iqbal wrote: :Hi All : :I am using the spell check in pine. How do I now add words so it won't always :find it as a misspell ? : :Thanks : : From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:49:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGn3UF009517; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:49:04 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGn1lp023162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:49:02 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBPGlSop014262; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:47:28 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGiHuL022990 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:44:17 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGiGgN000534 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:44:16 -0800 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGiEP3024335; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:44:14 -0800 Received: from localhost (mrc@localhost) by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBPGiEkA026221; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:44:14 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:44:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: workaround for messages from Pine blocked? #031225@06:50:41.6311 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bruce Cohen X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum , pine@CAC.Washington.EDU X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Bruce Cohen wrote: > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host smtp.chello.nl[213.46.243.2] said: 551 > Mail from your IP address is currently blocked based on RBL listing > (in reply to RCPT TO command) > > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host mx.dds.nl[213.204.195.153] said: 451 Blocked - see > http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?195.241.76.186 (in reply to RCPT TO > command) This has nothing to do with Pine. The problem is that your source IP address (which appears to be 195.241.76.185, ha-smtp0.tiscali.nl) is blacklisted. You'll need to talk to your ISP about this, since they are the only ones who can fix the problem. According to spamcop.net: 195.241.76.186 listed in bl.spamcop.net (127.0.0.2) Since SpamCop started counting, this system has been reported about 40 times by about 20 users. It has been sending mail consistently for at least 58.7 days. In the past 9.8 days, it has been listed 3 times for a total of 2.5 days In the past week, this system has: * Been reported as a source of spam less than 10 times * Been witnessed sending mail about 1890 times -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:54:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBQIsJUF016339; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:54:19 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBQIsHlp024921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:54:18 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBQIs6Ak016424; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:54:06 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBQIqruL047216 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:52:53 -0800 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (qmail.qwestip.net [205.171.7.14]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBQIqq2X021039 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:52:52 -0800 Received: (qmail 2853 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2003 18:52:59 -0000 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (HELO qmail) ([205.171.7.14]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail.qwestip.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Dec 2003 18:52:59 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 13:52:59 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Asif Iqbal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Addition to the Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Claus Atzenbeck X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: iqbala@qmail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: > Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 10:14:04 +0100 (CET) > From: Claus Atzenbeck > To: Asif Iqbal > Cc: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: Addition to the Dictionary > > On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Asif Iqbal wrote: > > > I am using the spell check in pine. How do I now add words so it won't always > > find it as a misspell ? > > This depends on the spell check application, which is not part of > Pine. Pine just calles it. What is a good spell check application ? I am having trouble compiling ispell in Solaris 8. I followed all the suggestions in README about workarounds but still failing to compile Thanks > > Claus > -- Asif Iqbal http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B686E08 There's no place like 127.0.0.1 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:55:36 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBQItZUF016393; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:55:35 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBQItX72008223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:55:34 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBQItIFe005026; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:55:18 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBQIrJuL047226 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:53:19 -0800 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (qmail.qwestip.net [205.171.7.14]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBQIrIDv020806 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:53:18 -0800 Received: (qmail 3032 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2003 18:53:25 -0000 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (HELO qmail) ([205.171.7.14]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail.qwestip.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Dec 2003 18:53:25 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 13:53:25 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Asif Iqbal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Addition to the Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Aurangzeb M. Agha" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: iqbala@qmail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN What spell check application are you using ? On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Aurangzeb M. Agha wrote: > Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 08:13:03 -0800 (PST) > From: Aurangzeb M. Agha > To: Asif Iqbal > Cc: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: Addition to the Dictionary > > When you're doing spell-check, hit the letter 'a' (add) on a word which > comes up mis-spelled so it doesn't come up next time. > > Aurangzeb > > On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Asif Iqbal wrote: > > :Hi All > : > :I am using the spell check in pine. How do I now add words so it won't always > :find it as a misspell ? > : > :Thanks > : > : > -- Asif Iqbal http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B686E08 There's no place like 127.0.0.1 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:32:55 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBRCWsUF015694; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:32:54 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBRCWqlp018892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:32:53 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBRCVH1r011216; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:31:17 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBRCUVuL041024 for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:30:32 -0800 Received: from natsmtp00.webmailer.de (natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBRCUTf0023692 for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:30:30 -0800 Received: from localhost (ACB84160.ipt.aol.com [172.184.65.96]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBRCUQBI018946; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 13:30:26 +0100 (MET) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6E6A959D1E3; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:34:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5441D59D1E1; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:34:28 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:34:28 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Addition to the Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Asif Iqbal X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.local X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XII, Probability=12%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Asif Iqbal wrote: > What is a good spell check application ? I'm using aspell on Linux and MacOS X. I think it is pretty good. It also has modes for e-mail, LaTeX, etc. Claus From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:22:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBT2M0UF010414; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:22:00 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBT2Lw72024643 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:21:59 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBT2LjFe016224; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:21:45 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBT2KHuL052846 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:20:18 -0800 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (qmail.qwestip.net [205.171.7.14]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBT2KG2X031051 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:20:16 -0800 Received: (qmail 25824 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2003 02:20:23 -0000 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (HELO qmail) ([205.171.7.14]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail.qwestip.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2003 02:20:23 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:20:23 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Asif Iqbal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Word/Excel reader from pine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: iqbala@qmail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi All Is there a reader I can use in Pine to view word/excel attachments ? Thanks -- Asif Iqbal http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B686E08 There's no place like 127.0.0.1 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:21:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBT8LlUF020575; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:21:47 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBT8Lj72032132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:21:45 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBT8LX1r014492; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:21:34 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBT8KZuL036822 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:20:35 -0800 Received: from smtp.mediadev.com (smtp.mediadev.com [81.57.73.118]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBT8KXbc003017 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:20:34 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E422BEE1; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:20:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 03D5A2BEE1; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:20:31 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20031229082031.GA5829@mediadev.com> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:20:31 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Simon White To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Word/Excel reader from pine In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-To: Asif Iqbal X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20 X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.14; VAE: 6.23.0.2; VDF: 6.23.0.19; host: smtp.mediadev.com) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN 28-Dec-03 at 21:20, Asif Iqbal (iqbala@qwestip.net) wrote : > Is there a reader I can use in Pine to view word/excel attachments ? You can get antiword for Word documents, and set Pine up to pipe to it. Don't know about Excel though. If you're running PC-Pine you probably just want to be able to open the files in Word/Excel directly (or the free viewers if you don't have Office), that should be in the FAQ I reckon. -- /| _ _ Simon White, Web Manager / | | \ MediaDev, 5 bis rue du Louvre, 75001 Paris, France _|_ | Tel: +33 1 40 15 92 00 Fax: +33 1 40 15 92 62 _|_/ http://www.mediadev.com email: swhite@mediadev.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:38:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBU9caUF008837; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:38:36 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBU9cY72007137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:38:34 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBU9cMAk014848; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:38:23 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id hBU9aWuL045402 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:36:33 -0800 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (qmail.qwestip.net [205.171.7.14]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id hBU9aVSm026493 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:36:31 -0800 Received: (qmail 7063 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2003 09:36:38 -0000 Received: from qmail.qwestip.net (HELO qmail.arl.qwestip.net) ([205.171.7.14]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail.qwestip.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Dec 2003 09:36:38 -0000 Received: (from iqbala@localhost) by qmail.arl.qwestip.net (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id hBU9acc07059 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 04:36:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20031230093638.GG1300@qwestip.net> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 04:36:38 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Asif Iqbal To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Calendar In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: qmail.arl.qwestip.net: iqbala set sender to iqbala@qwestip.net using -f X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Asif Iqbal wrote: > Hi All > > I am using {localhost:1234}INBOX as my INBOX. How do I add stuff in the calendar > and also get reminder alert in pine ? > > Any help/suggestion would be greatly appreciated > > Thanks > I am still looking for a solution. Appreciate any help/suggestion regarding this Thanks -- Asif Iqbal http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8B686E08 There's no place like 127.0.0.1